Foreign and domestic expertise in assessing student’s success in universities and colleges

Foreign and domestic expertise in assessing student’s success in universities and colleges

The assessment system in various nations has its peculiarities that are own. For instance, in United states advanced schooling institutions assessment of students is carried away in credits. Each credit needs a one-hour (50 min.) lecture, a presentation at a seminar or participation in a(3-hour that is laboratory-practical class. In addition, students must invest couple of hours on non-attendance training. Throughout the semester program (3 hours week that is per, 3 credits are credited for just two hours seminary classes, 3 credits for 2-3 hours laboratory lessons and one credit per semester.

Pupils take exams through the core disciplines in the centre and also at the end of this semester. Evaluate understanding of the page system: A («excellent»), B («good»), C («satisfactory»), B («satisfactory with a» that is minus, E («unsatisfactory»). In the event of «satisfactory with a minus» the student is obliged to listen to the program once again and to pass the exam. The criterion of success is an average semester score. Students regarded as a learning pupil whom received 2 points and higher. The surname associated with pupil who scored 3.5 points is entered into the list that is honorary of dean’s office. A student whom scored from 1.7 to 1.99 points gets a caution in regards to the have to improve performance, if he recovers this exact same rating or from 1.1 to 1.7, then gets a serious caution. In cases where a student receives 1.1 points for a semester or has warnings that are serious can not score a score of 2, or when after caution gaining lower than 1.7 points, he could be taken faraway from the college.

European experience of evaluating pupil’s success

In Germany, pupils’ understanding of higher education organizations is examined on a 5-point system:

  • «very good» (1),
  • «good» (2),
  • «satisfactory» (3),
  • «enough» (4),
  • «not sufficient» (5).

Triumph can also be defined in credits. One credit hour per semester ensures that the pupil must work within one week of 1 hour using this control. For the 4-year term, the student must make 150-160 credits.

Italian universities have an interest in system needless to say exams, that are accepted by commissions comprising three instructors, every one of that could place at the most 10 points. The protection of written theses or a draft in the front of a payment of 11 teachers is a exam that is final. The total rating can achieve 110 points.

The integration associated with the advanced schooling system in to the European educational area, the development of a credit-module system in advanced schooling institutions, a special destination within the system of evaluation of this level of expert training for the graduate, obliges each instructor to analyze the knowledge of foreign and domestic advanced schooling, creatively use it in his practical activity.

Rating system of student’s success evaluation

The rating system of assessment of real information primarily activates the pupil’s independent work, helps it be rhythmic and systematic through the semester; better educated and cognitive activity is motivated, the part of advertising autonomy, initiative, obligation, imagination in educational and activity that is cognitive; the objectivity of this assessment is increased, almost completely unrelated towards the successful or unsuccessful reply to the score or exam; the mental anxiety throughout the test decreases notably. In addition, it allows the instructor to individualize learning and an approach that is differentiated students, plays a role in the rational construction for the student throughout the semester, especially throughout the exam sessions.

Utilization of the rating system of assessment within the process that is educational the biased method of the assessment of pupils’ knowledge; will act as a fruitful means of encouraging educational and intellectual activity; raises the student’s responsibility for learning outcomes; promotes the implementation of the principle of individualization of training; removes the issue of going to classes; frees the pupil time for classes by passions; the nature of cooperation prevails when you look at the audience, the teacher ceases to be always a manager, an such like.

Consequently, the instructor must be cautious and artistically to utilize the criteria and norms for evaluating the ability, abilities and abilities of students. It must be led because of the scientific concepts of this methodology of academic work, attentively connect with each student, taking into consideration his inclinations, passions and aspirations, to exhibit high principles and tact.

Добавить комментарий

Ваш e-mail не будет опубликован. Обязательные поля помечены *

Можно использовать следующие HTML-теги и атрибуты: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>